Home » Business Monthly » Why it’s time all African countries took a stand on skin lightening creams

Why it’s time all African countries took a stand on skin lightening creams

With up to 70% of women using skin lightening creams in parts of africa,
Cote d’Ivoire has led the charge in tackling skin lighteners and has banned the practise nation- ally. It is time for the rest of the continent to follow.

skin lighteners have become a common part of life in communities across the continent which is home to an estimated two thirds of the world’s darker-skinned population. In the late 1960s, 60% of urban african women reported using skin lightener formulas. It became the fourth most commonly used house- hold product after soap, tea and tinned milk.

these   days,   75%   of   Nigerian women and between 52% and 67% of senegalese women use skin light- ening products. a survey conduct- ed in south africa’s administrative capital Pretoria showed that 35% of women use them.

Demand is also high in ghana, tanzania and Kenya where buoyant economies and advertising have tar- geted young women of marriageable age. there  has  been  a  marked  shift in male preferences toward women with light-coloured skin emphasising the idea of “racial capital”.

But skin lighteners are damag- ing. the World  Health  Organisation has banned the active ingredients of skin lighteners – a chemical agent called hydroquinone and mercury – from being used in any unregulated skin products. unregulated products have significantly higher quantities of hydroquinone and mercury than those recommended by dermatol- ogists. using them could lead to liver and kidney failure or hyper- pigmentation, which is dark skin patches forming on the area where the  product  is  used.  there  is  also a risk of skin cancer because the melanin synthesis which protects the skin against ultraviolet radiation is inhibited by hydroquinone.

The stereotype

the  word  “yellowbone”  has  gained popularity in the us as well as coun- tries like south africa. It refers to a lighter-skinned black person, perpet- uating the lengthy racist Eurocentric tradition which propagates negative images and aesthetics of black peo- ple and people of colour.

african descendants in america, the Caribbean and Brazil have inter- nalised these fabricated and fiction- alised images of themselves. In an american setting, this is a psycholog- ical abnormality coined Post trauma slavery Disorder. In south  africa, it could be equated to what I have coined “Post-apartheid Inferiority Disorder” (PaID). the  most  visible global symptoms include:

  • use of skin lightening or bleach- ing creams
  • preference for white or light- skinned friends and children
  • wearing of blond hair or blond wigs
  • internalised inferiority and a lack of self-love or veneration
  • lack of group unity and

 

the  motivation  for  using  skin lighteners is linked to colonial his- tory. Lightening one’s skin is per- ceived to come with increased priv- ileges, higher social standing, better employment and increased marital prospects. this,  coupled  with  influ- ential marketing strategies from transnational cosmetic houses using iconic celebrities, increases the allure

– primarily for women, but increas- ingly for men.

skin lightening is described in many different ways across the conti- nent. In Mali and senegal, the terms “caco” and “xeesal” are used while in ghana, the term “nensoebenis” describes the condition of the skin after chronic skin lightener use.

With its political overtones, south africa has a distinctive history with skin lighteners. Various ethnic languages describe the practice. In isiXhosa it is known as “ukutsheyi- sa” which means “to chase beauty”. In isiZulu it is known as “ukucream- er” meaning “applying creams on the skin”.

 

The health risks

skin lightening creams can be divid- ed into legal products recommended by dermatologists and illegal, over- the-counter and unregulated prod- ucts.

Most reputable skin lighteners are expensive. Because of this, the market is vulnerable to over-the- counter, unregulated and unsuper- vised   use   of   skin   lighteners.  the use of these creams can result in irreversible skin damage. The  majority  of  illegal  “depig- menting” or skin lightening creams can contain between 8% to 15% of hydroquinone. the use of hydroqui

none in cosmetics has been banned since 2001. Hydroquinone is used in large quantities in paints and as a photographic developing solution. Despite the laws restricting the use of hydroquinone, I found a range of different brands of skin lighteners available in pharmacies and supermarkets in the Johannesburg area. the   attraction   to   the   practise is encouraged by overt advertising and the advent and influence of social media and mobile phones with roaming apps.

although individuals have start- ed speaking out against skin lighten- ing, such as the senegalese models who  took  a  stand  at  the  Dakar

Fashion Week, governments need to  take action. Regulations should ensure that the creams are safe and that illegal products are kept off the market. In  addition,  governments should

encourage the view that being paler skinned  isn’t  a  panacea  and that black is beautiful too.

The writer, Lester M. Davids, is Professor of Cell Biology, Dept. of Human Biology, UCT, University of Cape Town